天美传媒

The emerging technological landscape enables firms to put dynamic capabilities into practice easier than ever before.

By Amy Shuen, Haas Berkeley & Sandra Sieber

When Skype first burst onto the scene, everyone predicted the familiar story of disruptive innovation in the telecom industry, where the new destroys the old way of doing business in a spiraling zero-sum game. Fast forward to the present: Apple鈥檚 iPhone has shown a new win-win path to success using collaborative innovation on the Web. The iPhone brought together thousands of handset makers, operators and software developers, giving them a considerable share of a market already worth $2 billion a year, and reinvented several industries in the process.

In a similar fashion, diverse companies 鈥� from Google and Amazon, to IBM, Cisco and Intuit 鈥� are continuing to innovate their business models and grow, despite the economic crisis, with revenue and success widely shared. Many industry leaders are wondering if the core principles of strategic management and competitive advantage have changed. The answer, we argue, is a resounding yes.

Here鈥檚 why: The Web has changed the economics of business and collaboration. Companies can no longer conceive of their capabilities in isolation, but must learn to co-create them within a broader, dynamic and non-zero-sum ecosystem of external partners. The new 鈥渕anaged鈥� but open ecosystems range from 鈥渙rchestrated鈥� standards-based networks of developers, to communities and 鈥渃rowds鈥� of lead users and bloggers, to e-commerce affiliates, to complementary businesses that cross industry divides.

A highly cited Strategic Management Journal article from 1997 once defined 鈥渄ynamic capabilities鈥� as a company鈥檚 strategic ability to combine inside and outside competences to address volatile environments and periods of rapid change. Orchestration was lauded over positioning, management innovation and combinations over structure, and transformative collaboration over traditional strategizing as the means of gaining competitive advantage.

Few could have predicted when that article was written the widespread social transformation that the Web, broadband and mobile technologies would trigger, nor the exponential growth of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and Apple 鈥� businesses that rely on the economics of network effects, social influence, viral distribution and Web-enabled business models. Now, thanks to Web 2.0 business models and platforms, collective user value, along with ways to more productively monetize and enhance the 鈥渨isdom of the crowd,鈥� has become commonplace. It鈥檚 the modern version of the old fable 鈥渟tone soup,鈥� in which hungry villagers each contribute whatever they can spare 鈥� a carrot here, a potato there, some leftover scraps of meat. In the end, everyone enjoys a hearty, collectively co-created soup. The Web is today鈥檚 soup pot, taking individual contributions, remixing them and redistributing them as something new across many networks with almost zero costs.

This year, Berkeley鈥檚 Oliver Williamson won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on the transaction costs underlying industrial structure and organizational boundaries. These are the very same transaction and coordination costs that Webenabled business models are transforming substantially. Little wonder that 鈥渃ollaborative innovation鈥� and the new 鈥渄ynamic capabilities鈥� of orchestrating knowledge, ecosystems, partnerships and collective user value across multiple industrial and geographic boundaries have become top strategic priorities for the Fortune 500 agenda.

This article is published in 天美传媒 Insight Isue 3 (Q4 2009).

This content is exclusively for personal use. If you wish to use any of this material for academic or teaching purposes, please go to 天美传媒 Publishing where you can purchase a special PDF version of 鈥溾�� (ART-1605-E), as well as the in which it appears, in English or in Spanish.